After the Intro, Start Here:
Explore this unique, new model of how you are the creator of your life experiences through your mind, body and spirit system.
Beliefs are the most powerful form of energy on the planet. Learn how they direct human society and collectively create the current condition of world.


The People’s Intention Must Change For New Leaders to Emerge

The People’s Intention Must Change For New Leaders to Emerge

 Part 4 from … “Have We Chosen the Wrong Type of People to Govern Ourselves?” 

Uplifting America Series  by Michael Krajovic 

          In the previous three articles, several points were made to try to get others to think more about the type of people they elect to public office.  Countries around the world are beginning to go through a period of great transition.  Real and honest leadership is needed to lead humanity beyond the primitive behaviors and social programs it has been stuck with for decades.  It is time for America to step up if it is going to lead the world into a new era of human advancement with greater peace and prosperity for all of the world’s people in a sustainable way that supports all life on the planet for countless future generations. 

        For society to change course, we must be clearer on the type of persons we consider to be a successful government leader.  We could look to the past for guidance because there have been politicians who are considered to have served well.   Of course, this all depends upon how “served well” is defined.  This is an important point because just as society has been looking towards the wrong type of people for leadership, their expectations and definitions of successful leadership are just as off target.  Too often success in political leadership is measured by the ability to bring “the bacon back home.”  Many politicians believe their job is to financially support their constituents by using their influence to shift public dollars into their districts.  It has been the most effective way for incumbents to stay in office.  As long as they get their picture in the paper passing out checks or at ground breaking and ribbon cutting ceremonies, the constituents believe that they are doing their job.  And the professional politician truly believes that he or she is doing their job. After all with billions and trillions of dollars to decide how to divide up, it is only fair that some of those dollars are brought back home to benefit local taxpayers.

             Unfortunately this expectation of constituents to expect money back for local, high profile projects, distract politicians from addressing the very real and serious problems that threaten the entire society.  As they fight over which political party gets to steer the ship, the idea of compromise and leadership has been “dumbed down” to just getting a piece of government’s budget pie to bring home to the local constituents, and to benefit the bottom line of their financial contributors.   This dominates the culture in state and federal government because it is their constituents’ and supporters’ expectations.  When politicians are being publicly commended and buildings and highways are being named after them, it is easy to understand how they can believe they are doing the right thing.  More quietly, regulatory or contract favors for private corporations go publicly unnoticed, but the financial contributions pile as rewards for making the “right” business decisions.  As a result the core systemic problems based on entrenched ideologies, institutionalized bureaucracies, special interests and corporate influence, go unaddressed.  It is like rearranging the chairs on the Titanic.  It will keep you busy, but it won’t prevent the impending disaster where everyone loses, dramatically going down with the ship.  And judging from their actions, our politicians and their constituents don’t even realize that they are on the same ship together.  

         I have personally experienced the local expectation for politicians to “bring home the bacon” coming from an area that can best be described politically as being “libertarian democratic socialists.”  While this political oxymoron may sound quite strange, I feel it is quite common.  The difference in political philosophy depends upon the level of government.  For many local public officials, they act as ultra conservatives or libertarians, who run and stay in office on the platform of promising to never raise local taxes.  Whether it is a city, county or township, they won’t raise taxes to invest in their own community.   But when it comes from getting handouts from either the state or federal government, they become ultra liberal supporting every social grant program their state and federal representatives can bring to their towns.  They elect people to state and federal government who will every once in a while get them “free” grant monies.  Everyone is trying to use government to benefit themselves.  Whether it is a multinational corporation or a constituent, the primary motivating force in the current election process is self interests.  Very few are truly working to use government to serve others or to pull collective resources to solve societal problems.  Very few are willing to make sacrifices for the collective good.  And very few of this very few, are engaged in redefining government’s purpose to address the systemic problems.  For example, no one is working on how government can help others, without creating permanent dependency.  Help when needed needs to be provided efficiently and in a way that leads to self empowerment, not ongoing dependency on public assistance.  Even those that want to cut national government programs will only pass the problem on to the states and local communities.  The problems will not be addressed, but only be passed down to someone else to solve.  A primary reason why the federal government has grown so large is because local and state governments have failed to take care of their own needs, passing the problem on to the federal government.  This seesaw of back and forth between the levels of government does little to address the core systemic challenges facing society which must be addressed by considering the common interests with serious and meaningful deliberation.  At the current elementary level of cultural understanding, society needs to redefine what “common interests” means, something that sadly has been forgotten.

             At the core of the problem lies the will of the average voter who has given away their power to those that tell them what they want to hear rather than what they need to hear.  This is true for all levels of government.  Leaders who are willing to stand up and take on serious issues have become a rarity.  Leaders with the combination of courage and humility with a deep desire to serve and improve life for all human beings are rare.  It is almost impossible for them to get elected to office.  Thus, avoiding controversy, learning to speak without saying anything substantial or making commitments to keep people confused, has become the political norm of the day.  Politics has become the art of speaking without saying anything or convincing others that the hidden self interests of the politician and their financial backers are in the self interests of the people.

             The type of people in office is only the symptom of a much deeper problem.  The crisis in electing the right people to office is a crisis of the will of the people. It is a crisis of intention.  Society has lost its sense of purpose.  People have lost their sense of community.  They have lost their sense of government which was once a place to come together to address common interests rather than pursue self interests. They do not know how to blend individuality and its freedoms together with unity and acting for the common good.  They have forgotten that freedom and rugged individualism came with a responsibility to others, through a pledge of allegiance to the republic with liberty and justice for all.  And true justice comes from creating a just society, not from seeking justice after an offense.  Without a higher intention of what the purpose of living together is meant achieve, civil society will fail, as it is now beginning.

           We must revisit our common goals and the principles by which we want to live our lives and operate our government.  Government after all is simply a process that we use to operate our society.  Over 200 year ago, America was a new process of government that broke from the tradition of people being governed by a select few like the kings and queens of Europe.  It was formed as the government of the governed, or for people to govern themselves.   Right now as a government and as a people, America, the leader of the free world, is struggling, as are many other democratic governments.  If we are not clear as a people on the type of society that we want to create in any country, then we will be unclear on the type of leaders we seek.  We will continue to flounder, pulling ourselves apart, regardless of who we elect to operate our government.  How our government runs is a reflection on the collective intention of the people.  What we intend to create is a reflection on our values, our beliefs, our consciousness or in other words, our level of spirituality.  Government is the physical manifestation of our spirituality.  It determines how we care for our children, our elderly and our poor.  It determines how we resolve conflicts, what laws we pass, how we divide up resources, how we care for the environment, etc.  All of this is a demonstration of how our beliefs allow us to see or not see each other as fellow human beings. 

          This series of four articles started with the idea of how our beliefs are formed from our experiences.  It is time for us as a society to examine our past experiences and determine if this is type of life in our country and around the world that we want to create.  After all it is our collective thoughts, ideas and intentions that have created the current condition of the world.  In it, there are two golden rules, the one we are using now where gold (money) rules, and the one taught by our religions, that we have forgotten.  Our society and governments and our individual lives are now mostly influenced and controlled by our pursuit of money, (gold) profit.  If this is our collective intention, to compete for more gold and power, then we will continue to create more of the same and compete against each other to liquidate the world’s resources to where we will eventually consume ourselves as a species out of existence, if we don’t destroy ourselves sooner with our misuse of technology as the divisions between the Haves and Have Nots increases human desperation and conflict.  We as divine beings of human free will must decide which Golden Rule we will follow as a society.  This will determine the type of persons we choose to serve as our representatives in our own government.  Our collective intention, and the attention we give it through our thoughts, words and actions will determine our future.  Everything, everything hinges on this one decision.



By Michael Krajovic,  Uplifting Humanity 7/5/11

(Preface – This is an article dealing with American agriculture that is globally relevant.  Most of the world is trying to achieve America’s level of industrial agriculture, but is not aware of the America’s decline in food quality or availability.  The recommended proposal, while innovative and urgently needed, is just another example of trying to fix a growing problem that is ultimately a result of failed monetary and economic systems which are hundreds of years old and that need to be “revolutionalized” in order to create a sustainable and peaceful world.)


The agricultural landscape has drastically changed in America over the last hundred years.   Unable to be adequately compensated for their labors through the imposition of a speculative commodity food market, thousands of farmers and millions of people were economically forced off the farm.  They migrated into urban areas which have grown into massive metropolitan regions.  This growth has led to the destruction of farmland through suburban sprawl and the emergence of food deserts in urban centers.  Food deserts are created as farmland is consumed in successive waves of development, forcing urban populations geographically farther from fresh food supplies.

The trend of losing farmers, farmland and farm businesses continues today as a triple threat to not only America’s food supply, but the entire world.  The side effects are increasing food insecurity and a growing global sense of desperation.  This results in greater pressures to industrializing food production in order to maximize food quantity.  Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia are all industrializing their agriculture trying to make farmers more efficient to produce more food.  This comes at the expense of both quality and safety as centrally processed foods become the main dietary staple.  Obesity, infertility, depression, diabetes, food borne illnesses and other preventable health hazards are becoming common place even in the most developed countries.

Also surprisingly, food deserts  are now appearing in rural areas as farmers stop growing fruits and vegetables for their local communities because they are more labor intensive to grow than industrial commodity crops like corn, wheat and soy beans.  Combined with the continued monopolization of the food distribution and food retail, small local grocery stores cannot compete against the big box retailers like Walmart; however, in sparsely populated, small communities, the large retailer may be located twenty or miles away.  This creates a barrier for accessing fresh and nutritious foods for the residents many small, rural communities.

Wall Street investors sense an opportunity.  Future shortages and desperation mean higher food prices and the potential for tremendous returns on investments.   All types of hedge funds, pension funds, corporations now compete to own farmland or invest in food related biotech companies, fertilizer companies, etc. to hopefully profit from the coming food shortages and rising prices.  At the same time foreign countries scramble to compete in the purchase of farmland in an effort to secure food sources for their populations.  All of this puts immediate pressure on small and mid-sized farmers who are not large enough to generate enough income to financially survive the wild price swings in commodity wholesale food prices, and to pay for inputs like seed, energy  and fertilizer whose prices are also just as unpredictable.   The end result is a continued loss of not only farms, but farmers.  The average age of a farmer is over 58 years old in America, and there are very few people that are willing to take their place.  Each year thousands of farmers are forced to retire due to old age and their farms follow the same fate.  Something must be done to preserve the small and medium sized independent farmer.

The problems to preserve this dying breed of independent farmers are indeed challenging and many worthwhile efforts are being made to meet them.  While these noble efforts will help some, they will not be able to reverse the historically steady decline and eventual loss of small to midsized farms at the expense of both local rural economies and the larger national economy.  The problem is more severe than realized, and cannot be reversed without moving in a new direction other than just more industrialization. 


With many of America’s farmers nearing the age of retirement and having struggled financially to just survive all of their working lives, the main source of savings for their retirement is their land.  Very few of their children, having witnessed their parent’s hard work, financial struggles and sacrifices, want to stay on the farm.  Thousands and thousands of farms have already been sold to pay for retirements, turned into residential or commercial development to accommodate the growth of metro areas.  In less developed rural areas, the farm is sold for less sometimes in bankruptcy foreclosure, usually for the market price of single residential use, or to become part of a larger farm or a much larger corporate agriculture conglomerate, some foreign owned.

Many people that are aware of this trend, hope that these farms will remain a locally owned and operated by a family member or a new generation farmer.  But for this to happen, the farm must be profitable.  Most are not.  That is why they are failing. Outside of dairy, most farmers in many states like Pennsylvania are hobby farmers, the term used to describe those that might own around a hundred acres or more, plant commodity crops, and have a full time job in another industry outside of agriculture to support themselves.  They now face, through the unstoppable passage of time, both the creep of old age and rising property taxes as desperate states and local municipal governments try scramble to increase revenues.  At the same time, they are faced with the rising costs of inputs like seed, fertilizer, equipment, fuel and utilities.  And of course the biggest agriculture challenge they face, unique to this production industry, is their frustrating inability to set their own fair price for their food to recover these costs and make a family sustaining wage.  They are held captive to the speculative commodity markets and the unpredictability of wholesale food pricing, like indentured servants years ago with the exception that they have no end to their contract.

The key question is how can these current and pressing challenges be overcome to motivate a new generation of people to go into farming today when the historical trend would lead one to conclude it is not even worth trying?  Every year that goes by, the situation becomes more desperate as our farmers age and step closer to retirement. In a few short years, this trend will become a national, mega-disaster.

While it is commendable for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to be investigating new ways to encourage the private banking sector to make more agricultural loans through loan guarantees which will help in some situations, it will not reverse the overall trend.  Banks love to extend new credit.  It is how they make money.  One of the first hurdles to overcome for any borrower so that a bank will put their own capital at risk to make a loan is to have adequate collateral.  The fixed assets of a farm, land and buildings, have in most areas established asset values, which make great collateral.  Banks can easily swap these assets for credit, but it is not enough.  Backing a loan through a guarantee program will help, but the main banking question that still needs to be addressed is – where does the revenue come from to repay the loan?  And given the historically wild volatility of the speculative futures’ markets of trade, in milk and other food commodities, farmers will not be able to adequately answer this very simple, but extremely important question.  If the farm business cannot guarantee their revenue stream to repay the loan, the bank will most likely in every case not make the loan even with a government guarantee standing behind the loan.   Why?  Because it is bad for the banking business to foreclose on loans.  They really do not like the negative publicity of having to force a family out of their home, especially in small communities.  They will do it if they have to, as is happening hundreds of times each week across the country, but it is not the business they are in; and it cost them time, resources and profits.  Speak to bankers from both large corporations and small community banks and they will confirm the same conclusion – their banks will not make the loan if the cash flows of the business cannot pay back the loan.

But the really key question which gets to the essence of problem that needs to be answered is – How can a new farmer make it financially and be profitable with a new mortgage and greater debt to pay, when the previous farmer who inherited the farm with little or no debt could not make the farm work?

The answer to this question is self evident – they can’t.  This is the reason for this crisis.


There needs to be a new financing program in production agriculture which will support the growth of a new generation of farmers in America.  One has already been proposed by the Fay-Penn Economic Development Council, located in Pennsylvania.  The organization has been able to gain the support of many groups around the country including the National Farmers Union, the International Economic Development Council, the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and others.  It is worth noting that this is the first time in the history that the world’s largest economic development association has engaged in supporting agriculture.  This demonstrates the growing recognition of the crisis in agriculture and importance of this program to economic development and new job creation.

The proposal is to create a program that provides innovative financing to farmers who are producing food for the local market.  At a time when governments are seeking to create new employment opportunities, there is an entire new generation of young entrepreneurs who would like to start farming, and there is evidence to support this.  They do not want to be hobby farmers or commodity farmers, but farmers that produce healthy food for local markets.  Whether it’s free range chickens, grass fed beef, specialty crops of fruits, vegetables, CSA’s or organic farmers, there are already many examples of local farmers succeeding.  They are successful because they have become directly connected to the local market and consumer where they can receive at or near retail prices for their food.  They have bypassed the big financial futures’ markets and their volatile wholesale pricing.  In the true spirit of American entrepreneurship and free enterprise, they have been able to take control of their own business activities to establish their own free market.  In this they have become like other typical businesses, responsible for their own pricing, production, marketing, distribution and planning.

Why this can work now and perhaps not before is because there is a rapidly growing demand by millions of consumer for locally produced food across the country.  It is fresher, more nutritious and safer than the massive, centrally processed industrial food system.  The market trend has been well documented.  The organic market demand in the United States continues to grow at nearly a 10% annual rate.  This creates a great opportunity for new local farm businesses in every community across the country to be able to take charge of pricing their own products to service the local market.


In order to support the growth of this agricultural business sector at a fast enough rate to counter the rapid decline of small to midsize farms, the nation needs a new “state-of-the-art” economic development financing program which will support these new agriculture business ventures.  The precedent for funding innovative financing programs is well established in other business sectors.  To support economic development, governments have for many years provided innovative financing and grant programs to create jobs in the manufacturing and technology sectors.  The justification for the appropriation of funds by both federal and state legislators has been the importance of manufacturing and technology companies to state economies and new job creation.  These are industries where people go to earn a paycheck, not spend it.  They bring money into an economy, not take it out.

Local agriculture can generate the same positive impact and more.  It can create new wealth in economies.  While manufacturing can create value added wealth by working with raw materials, agriculture can truly create new wealth by transforming a seed into a marketable product.  But due to the dominance of the commoditization of agriculture in many parts of the country, the industry is not nationally considered as economically significant as other business sectors.  Farmers are not widely recognized as nationally important as manufactures, researchers, defense contractors, construction contractors, all of whom are dependent upon annual massive government spending to operate.  In the national debate on government spending to stimulate the economy, agriculture has not been prominently mentioned in any strategy.  While the role of the US Department of Agriculture has been expanded to support government spending in such areas as renewable energy and rural broadband deployment, there has been no mention of production agriculture playing a significant role.  This is not in reference to current farm subsidies to underwrite the insolvency of modern agriculture, but targeted programs that serve as catalysts to support profitable farm businesses that can operate without ongoing government subsidies.  If done properly, small and mid-sized farmers can leap frog ahead of these other industries and stand alone, generating cash flows and wealth in all communities throughout the country and not be dependent upon continued government contracts for revenue.  For decades, governments have provided innovative financial and grant programs to support the manufacturing sector to produce widgets and the technology sectors to develop new enterprises such as green energy, so why can’t we provide innovative financial and grant programs to support the agricultural sector to produce food for local economies?  With the agricultural crisis intensifying, it is no longer debatable, but something that must happen.


If society fails to do this, as some investors would like to see, the inevitable will occur, which is the monopolization of the world’s food supply by global corporations.  Like other industries, our monetary system and the supporting economic system will eventually lead to continued agricultural consolidation through mergers and acquisitions to the point where just a handful of companies will dominate the entire industry sector.  Look what has happened in media, airlines, retail, banking, etc.  Agriculture is already moving in that direction.  It is utterly amazing that within our lifetimes, the concept of “food deserts” has ironically emerged in our country that has just experienced the greatest period of economic prosperity in the history of civilization on our planet.  And these deserts are now appearing in small rural communities that are becoming isolated from quality and healthy foods.  Small grocery stores are forced out of business by large box retailers that locate stores many miles apart making it more difficult for small towns to have regular and convenient access to fresh and perishable foods.

As many of the big players in agriculture are betting on, the world’s population will continue to increase to 9+ billion over the next 40 years and growing world food shortages will ultimately result in a period of higher pricing where demand exceeds supply.  This is why there is a major effort occurring all over the world to purchase farmland in other countries such as the Europeans and China purchasing land in Africa.  Countries are becoming very concerned about their food security. There are many examples of this, and as mentioned earlier, some are moving into the US to buy up farmland.  When faced with starvation, people will pay any price to eat.  While this may be a period of stable and rising profits, it will be a period of great global political instability and conflict. Russell Redding, a former Pennsylvania Secretary of Agriculture, summarizes this best when he said, “We are all busy and have to deal with many issues every day, but when we are hungry,  food becomes the only issue .”

Technology through genetic modification is viewed as the future savior, but the continual industrialization of soil is not sustainable.  There must be time for proper stewardship and nurturing of the land.  Squeezing out everything humans can get out of our topsoil through heavy industrial agriculture without putting anything back other than chemicals will not produce healthy food that can sustain civilization over centuries.  Current data on health trends in our own country over just a few decades support this observation.   It is one of the causes fueling the growth of consumer demand for organically grown foods.

This trend cannot continue without a parallel alternative.  The potential risks to the United States and the world are too great.  Large corporate farms will not go away.  They will continue to get their share which will continue to increase dramatically with current trends.  This is not a call for an anti-big corporate program, but a program for helping the small to mid-sized farmer survive in every country of the world.  Society needs to maintain enough producers to ensure that consumers have choices of where to purchase their food, of who they can buy their food from, on the quality of the food they purchase, and keep the free market system alive.


The US Department of Agriculture and other agriculture departments throughout the world by developing programs that encourage food production agriculture by small to mid-sized farms could play a much greater role in employing hundreds of thousands and eventually millions of the unemployed in the United States and the world.  Sadly many foreign countries are trying to industrialize agriculture without a long range vision of how to avoid the problems the US system has created.  This will eventually lead to a duplication of the agricultural and health challenges facing America.  But with the right economic development financial incentives and planning, local food production could become a major part of the long term economic recovery of not only the United States, but in small communities throughout the world.  Some of the founding fathers of America, like Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, recognized the importance of agriculture to creating new wealth and its importance as the foundation of both local and national economies.  With local agriculture, much greater wealth stays within the local community.  With industrial agriculture, as much wealth as possible is taken out of local communities to feed the investors of corporate farms, processors, distributors, wholesalers and retailers.

If just a fraction of the world’s economic stimulus funds that were authorized, appropriated and directed to address the economic crisis of the Great Recession of 2008 to create special programs to provide financing on “Main Street” for local production agriculture, it would create several times more jobs per $ billion than anything in current economic recovery strategies, and unlike defense, construction and other infrastructure investments, it will not be dependent upon future appropriations to maintain employment after the initial money is spent.

Such a program would also be unprecedented in making farmers become more like other local business owners, raising their stature in the business community, perhaps even becoming fully engaged members of Chambers of Commerce or economic development agencies.  The will have to, because they will have to become more directly connected to the consumers in their community like other retail businesses or manufacturers in order to be successful in the local market.  This is how it is in many third world countries.  They will no longer be out of sight and out of mind as they are in many parts of the country, forgotten and underappreciated, especially in the suburbs and cities of major metropolitan areas in developed countries.

In closing, the industrialization of world agriculture is not the long term solution to the world’s growing economic and food security challenges.  While the American industrial food system had a great run and boasted record production of quantity, health problems caused by long term soil overuse are beginning to emerge.  Foreign countries should take notice.  Bigger, larger, greater yields are not infinitely sustainable through chemicals and dead soil.  Living soil with micro nutrients and plants grown without toxic chemicals are important to sustaining human life and reducing costly, but preventable health treatments that drain money out of economies.  The world needs to organize itself into economically, agriculturally and environmentally self sustaining regions where quality food production from local agriculture becomes the foundation for establishing a high quality of life for all of humanity and its communities.



Humanity’s Biggest Threats Are Self Created

Humanity is facing several global challenges threatening its own survival. They are not the usual planetary apocalyptic suspects. Species have come and gone on the planet earth for millions of years. This is nothing new according to science. Their extinction was a result of natural catastrophes like asteroid collisions, polar shifts or massive solar flares. In contrast, modern man has only inhabited the planet for a relatively short period of time measured in thousands of years. The current threat, however, are not natural occurrences, but are unique in the history of the planet in that they are self-inflicted by one of its inhabiting species. As signs of our immaturity as an “intelligent” species, the threats to humanity are manmade, self created through lack of awareness and general ignorance combined with insatiable greed and self-perpetuating due to a fear of change and stubbornness to change as a result of egotistical self righteousness. Read the rest of this entry »


21st Century Capitalism…Adam Smith Would Be Appalled!

One of the key concepts associated with capitalism is “free markets.”  But in recent times, the 21st Century Market has malignantly taken on a life of its own that is destroying individual freedoms.  Adam Smith, the 18th century prodigy credited with being the father of modern capitalistic theory, would be appalled. Read the rest of this entry »


The 21st Century Market…And How It Is Destroying Our Freedoms

One of the key concepts associated with capitalism is “free markets.”  But in recent times, the market has malignantly taken on a life of its own that is destroying individual freedoms. This modern — super-computer operated Market of 21st century capitalism — has become the guiding principle of our government and society in general. Politicians and economists all over the world consider if their Market is doing well, their economy must be doing well and so must be the people of their nation. Read the rest of this entry »


Creating Your Virtual Life: A Tribute to Randy Paush

The Last Lecture by Randy Pausch is a book that initially caught my eye on the way into a local bookstore with its bright red 40% off discount tag.  I had remembered seeing a program on TV about the Last Lecture, the final talk on campus given by a Carnegie Mellon professor who was diagnosed with terminal cancer.  I read a few pages and finally decided to buy it.  Actually I picked it up and set it down three times before I bought it. Something was calling to me. A day later, I read half of the book before turning out the light to go to sleep, and then decided to finish it the very next morning. Read the rest of this entry »


To Cure Cancer, We Must Be Careful What We Wish For

I find it both amusing and tragic that while society claims it is searching for a cure for cancer it seems to overlook what causes cancer.  Is it just a giant mistake or something more insidious behind the claims that we really don’t know what causes it?  China had little cancer a few decades ago.  Cancer, stroke, heart disease, respiratory disease and poisoning are now the five leading causes of death.  After the massive industrialization and trashing of their water, air, soil with toxic chemicals, the cancer rate in many parts of China is now equal or exceeding the US rate, and is far greater than other Asian countries such as Thailand.  Its cancer rate is up over 80% since the 1970’s.  And yet people are still scratching their heads trying to figure out what causes cancer and how to cure it. Read the rest of this entry »


The Rise of Atheism, The Rise of Spirituality and the Uplifting of Religion

Having been a student of beliefs over the last seven years, I have been interested in asking what is behind the atheistic movement.  I have watched Sam Harris present his work “The End of Faith,” a book that I have along with other atheists’ works in my library.  As a subscriber to Free Inquiry and the Skeptical Inquirer, I have read works by Paul Kurtz and comments by many other writers.  I have also heard many contemporary spiritual leaders speak such as Deepak Chopra and Jean Houston and have several of their publications.  I am pleased to see their recent debate about GOD and other commentary that is occurring because this is the most important issue facing the world today. Read the rest of this entry »


It is Time for New Regional Visions

There are hundreds of metropolitan regions in the world each made up of hundreds of smaller communities. They are the center of nearly 90% of the world’s economic activity. The United States alone has grown to include 130 metro-economic regions with populations over 1 million that generate 85% of the country’s GDP, and most of the resources of these region’s are focused on generating more growth by winning the competitive economic game of a ‘flat world.’ It is now the time for the people of these regions to challenge the current trends and ask deeper questions about who they are, who do they want to become and what do they want to stand for in the world.
Read the rest of this entry »


Spiritual Activism

SPIRITUAL ACTIVISM ….it’s much more than just a call to action! If you are reading these words, it is probably because you are one of many people that are drawn to the intrigue of seeing these two words used together – spiritual and activism. Everyday more people are sensing an internal call to get involved in their community’s or country’s affairs. But for those that feel a sense of oneness and compassion, how can this be done without getting caught up in the angry debates so common now in our society? Today’s issues seem so complex, that it is easy to become paralyzed to a state of inaction for fear of being criticized or for having to choose to make one side right and another wrong. This article will try to address these questions, with the hopes of inspiring the spiritually minded to get involved, because at a level unprecedented in human history, their help is urgently needed. Read the rest of this entry »

Older posts «

» Newer posts